Internet-Draft IPv6 Rate Hop-by-Hop Option June 2026
Xiong & Zhu Expires 25 December 2026 [Page]
Workgroup:
6man
Internet-Draft:
draft-xz-6man-rate-option-00
Published:
Intended Status:
Standards Track
Expires:
Authors:
Q. Xiong
ZTE Corporation
X. Zhu
ZTE Corporation

IPv6 Rate Hop-by-Hop Option

Abstract

This document defines a new IPv6 Hop-by-Hop Option that enables Minimum Rate Limit Discovery along the forward path between a source host and a destination host. Each router along the path can update the option with the minimum of its local Maximum Rate (MRate) and the recorded value. The discovered rate can then be communicated back to the source via a return mechanism, enabling the source to adapt its transmission rate to match the bottleneck link capacity and queue buffer.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 25 December 2026.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

In IPv6 networks, applications often need to determine the bottleneck rate along a network path to avoid network congestion such as:

This document specifies a new IPv6 Hop-by-Hop (HBH) Option to record the minimum MRate along the forward path between a source and a destination host. The source host creates a packet with this Option and initializes the Min-MRate field with the value of the Rate for the outbound link that will be used to forward the packet towards the destination host. The transit nodes along the path can compute the new minimal MRate and compare with the Min-MRate field. Then it will replace the Min-MRate field if it is lower than the latter one.

This method has the potential to complete MaxRate Discovery in a single round-trip time, even over paths that have successive links, each with a lower MRate. The proposed Hop-by-Hop Option provides a lightweight, in-band mechanism for rate discovery that completes in one round-trip time, even over paths with multiple constrained links. This efficiency makes it suitable for dynamic rate adaptation in real-time applications.

2. Conventions Used in This Document

2.1. Abbreviations

HBH: Hop-by-Hop

MRate: Maximum Rate

RTT: Round-Trip Time

2.2. Requirements Language

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

3. Minimum MRate Discovery Operation

      +----------+                                      +-----------+
      | Source   |                                      |Destination|
      | Host     |                                      |Host       |
      +----------+                                      +-----------+
          |                                                 ^
          |                                                 |
          v                                                 |
        +----+       +----+      +----+      +----+      +----+
        | R1 | <-->  | R2 | <--> | R3 | <--> | R4 | <--> | R5 |
        +----+       +----+      +----+      +----+      +----+
          ---->20Gbps ----> 10Gbps---->5Gbps---->10Gbps---->
                                                            |
        <---------------------------------------------------+
                              Minimum MRate (e.g.,5Gbps)

         Figure 1: An Example IPv6/SRv6 Path between the Source
                 Host and the Destination Host

The Minimum MRate Discovery mechanism operates as follows:

  1. The source host creates a packet with the Minimum MRate Hop-by-Hop Option. It initializes the Min-MRate field in section 4 with the maximum rate of its egress interface that will be used to forward the packet towards the destination.

  2. Each transit router that processes the Hop-by-Hop Option examines the Min-MRate field. The router compares this value with the maximum rate which is computed based on the given slice and queue information.

  3. If the router's limited maximum rate is lower than the current Min-MRate value, the router updates Min-MRate to the lower value. This ensures that Min-MRate always contains the minimum MRate encountered along the path so far.

  4. When the packet reaches the destination, the Min-MRate field contains the bottleneck rate along the forward path.

  5. The destination can then communicate this rate back to the source using a return mechanism (e.g., in a reverse-direction packet containing the same option). The Min-MRate can also be notified to the source with the rate notification as per xz-rtgwg-srv6-rate-notification.

4. IPv6 Minimum MRate Hop-by-Hop Option

The Minimum MRate Hop-by-Hop Option has the following format:

   +---------------+---------------+---------------+---------------+
   |   Option Type |Option Data Len|R|     Flags   |     Priority  |
   +---------------+---------------+-------------------------------+
   |                        Minimal MRate                          |
   ----------------------------------------------------------------+
   |                            Slice ID                           |
   +---------------------------------------------------------------+

         Figure 2: Format of the Minimum MRate Hop-by-Hop Option

5. Example Usage Scenario

Consider a source (S) sending to a destination (D) via routers R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5. The links have the following maximum rates and minial MRates:

6. Security Considerations

To be discussed in future versions of this document.

7. IANA Considerations

This document requests to register an IPv6 Hop-by-Hop Option type in the "Destination Options and Hop-by-Hop Options" registry within the "Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Parameters" registry group.

8. Normative References

[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.
[RFC8200]
Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification", STD 86, RFC 8200, DOI 10.17487/RFC8200, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8200>.

Authors' Addresses

Quan Xiong
ZTE Corporation
Xiangyang Zhu
ZTE Corporation